Altmetric gender bias? – An exploratory study
The purpose of this study was to explore the existence of a gender bias in scholarly social media, specifically in the free, online reference manager Mendeley. Users of the online reference manager, Mendeley, are designated as “readers”, and Mendeley records and displays the number of users (“readers”) who saved/bookmarked the specific item to their reference libraries. In this paper we compare the number of readers of articles for which at least one author was male to the number of readers of articles for which at least one author was female. Our dataset was comprised of the publications of 60 women and 233 men. The researchers in this study were astrophysicists. Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science (WOS) was used to retrieve 12,000 publications of the above mentioned researchers. We searched for the number of Mendeley readers of each of these publications and calculated the average number of readers per male versus female authored publications. The analysis shows that that the average number of readers of publications of female authored publications was slightly higher than that of male authored publications, but the proportion of male authored publications found on Mendeley was slightly higher than on Web of Science. In addition male authored publications had the highest number of Mendeley readers in the dataset. To sum up, this exploratory study did not find concrete evidence for gender bias on Mendeley.
FERBER, Marianne. A. Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs, 1986, vol. 11, no 2, p. 381-389.
FERBER, Marianne. A. Citations and networking. Gender and Society, 1989, vol. 2, no 1, p/82-89.
WEST, Jevin D., JAQUET, Jennifer J, KING, Molly M., CORELL, Shelley. J., et BERGSTROM, Carl. T. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLOS ONE, 2013, vol. 8 no 7, e66212, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.
LARIVIÉRE, Vincent., NI, Chaoqun., GINGRAS, Yves., CRONIN, Blaise., et SUGIMOTO, Cassdy, R. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 2013, 204, p. 211-213.
AKSNES, Dag. W., RORSTAD, Kristoffer., PIRO, Fredrik., et Sivertsen, Gunnar. Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, vol. 62, no 4, p. 628-636.
CECI, Stephen. J., et WILLIAMS, Wendy M. Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. PNAS, 2011, vol. 108, no 8, p. 3157-3162.
VAN ARENSBERGEN, Pleun, VAN DER WEIJDEN, Inge., et VAN DEN BESSELAAR, Peter. Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 93, no 3, p. 857-868.
MARSH, Herbert. W., BORNMANN, Lutz., MUTZ, Rüdiger, DANIEL, Hans-Dieter, et O’Mara, A. Gender effects in peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research, 2009, vol. 79, p.12901325
VAN DEN WEIJDEN, Inge, et CALERO-MEDINA, Clara. Gender effects on evaluation indicators. ACUMEN Deliverable. February 2014. Available from http://research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/D4.13-Gender-Effects-on-Evaluation-Indicators.pdf
VAN DEN WEIJDEN, Inge, et CALERO-MEDINA. Gender, academic position and scientific publishing: A bibliometric analysis of the ouvres of researchers. In: Ed Noyons, ed. Proceedings of STI2014, Leiden, September 3-5, 2014. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2014. pp. 673-679. Available from http://sti2014.cwts.nl/download/f-y2w2.pdf
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. She Figures 2012 – Gender in Research and Innovation: Statisitcs and indicators. 2012. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she-figures-2012_en.pdf
KOUSHA, Kayvan, et THELWALL, Mike. Evaluating the web research dissemination of EU academics: A multi-discipline outlink analysis of online CVs. In: Juan Gorraiz, Edgar Schiebel, Christian Gumpenberger, Marianne Horlesberger and Henk Moed, eds. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference 2013. Vienna, Austria, July 15-20, 2013. pp. 705-719. Available from http://www.issi2013.org/Images/ISSI_Proceedings_Volume_I.pdf
ZAHEDI, Zoreh, COSTAS, Rodrigo, et WOUTERS, Paul. What is the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users? Could they help to identify alternative types of impact? In PLoS ALM Workshop, San Francisco, 7-9 October, 2013, Slides available from: http://lanyrd.com/profile/zohrehzahedi/slides/
ZAHEDI, Zoreh, COSTAS, Rodrigo, et WOUTERS, Paul. Broad altmetric analysis of Mendeley readerships through the “academic status” of the readers of scientific publications. . In: Ed Noyons, ed. Proceedings of STI2014, Leiden, September 3-5, 2014. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2014, pp. 720-723. Available from http://sti2014.cwts.nl/download/f-y2w2.pdf
ZAHEDI, Zoreh, COSTAS, Rodrigo, et WOUTERS, Paul.. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, no 2, p. 1491-1513.
LI, Xuemei., THELWALL, Mike., & GIUSTINI, Dean. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 2012, vol 91, no 2, p. 461-471.
BAR-ILAN, Judit, HAUSTEIN, Stephanie., PETERS, Isabella., PRIEM, Jason, SHEMA, Hadas, & TERLIESNER, Jens (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social Web. In: Éric Archambault, Yves Gringras and Vincent Lariviére, eds. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Montreal, Quebec, September 5-8, 2012, Montréal: Science-Metrix et OST. pp. 98-109. Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611/
HAUSTEIN, Stephanie, PETERS, Isabella, BAR-ILAN, Judit, PRIEM, Jason, SHEMA, Hadas, & TERLIESNER, Jens. Coverage and adoption of altmetric sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, no 2, p. 1145-1163.
BAR-ILAN, Judit. JASIST@mendeley. Presented at the ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics. Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar-ilan/
BAR-ILAN, Judit. JASIST 2001-2010. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, June 21, 2012, vol. 38 no 6, p. 24-28.
BAR-ILAN, Judit, SHEMA, Hadas, et THELWALL, Mike. Bibliographic references in Web 2.0. In: Blaise Cronin and Cassidy Sugimoto (eds). Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014, pp. 307-326.
MOHAMMADI, Ehsan, et THELWALL, Mike. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 65, no 8, p. 1627-1638.
CARON, Emiel, et VAN ECK, Nees Jan. Large scale author disambiguation using rule-based scoring and clustering. In: Ed Noyons, ed. Proceedings of STI2014, Leiden, September 3-5, 2014. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2014, pp. 79-86. Available from http://sti2014.cwts.nl/download/f-y2w2.pdf
CRONIN, Blaise. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion of evidence of a structural shift in scholarly publication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, vol. 52, no 7, p. 558-569.
WIKIPEDIA CONTRIBUTORS. Mendeley. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2015. Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mendeley&oldid=657283568
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.